Apple AirPods (3rd Generation) vs Bose Sport Earbuds II
Technical Specs & Value Comparison
Comparison Summary
AirPods 3 vs Sport Earbuds II
Pros
- + Product B is offered by Bose, a brand known for audio products, though specific technical features are not published.
- + The product name 'Sport Earbuds II' suggests a focus on active lifestyles, though specific water resistance or fit details are not provided.
- + No published specifications for Product B indicate a lack of features like ANC or Transparency Mode.
- + Product B has a current best price of $147.5, which is a published data point.
Cons
- - Lack of published specifications for key features like driver type, Bluetooth version, and audio codecs makes direct comparison challenging.
- - No published information on Active Noise Cancellation or Transparency Mode.
- - Battery life details (buds and total with case) are not published, making endurance comparisons impossible.
Best for
- -- Gym/running (inferred from 'Sport Earbuds II' name, though no specific IP rating is published)
- -- Active lifestyles (inferred from 'Sport Earbuds II' name, but without published secure fit details)
- -- Users prioritizing the Bose brand (brand recognition, though specific features are not published)
Apple AirPods (3rd Generation)
Bose Sport Earbuds II
Full Specifications Comparison
Side-by-side technical specs of AirPods 3 and Sport Earbuds II verified from official manufacturer documentation. Advantages are highlighted automatically.
| Specification | AirPods 3 | Sport Earbuds II |
|---|---|---|
| Driver Type | dynamic | -- |
| Driver Size (mm) | -- | -- |
| Frequency Range | -- | -- |
| Impedance (Ω) | -- | -- |
| Sensitivity (dB) | -- | -- |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 | -- |
| Audio Codecs | ["AAC"] | -- |
| Multipoint Connection | N | -- |
| Active Noise Cancellation | N | -- |
| ANC Reduction (dB) | -- | -- |
| Transparency Mode | N | -- |
| Battery (buds, ANC off) (hours) | 6 | -- |
| Battery (buds, ANC on) (hours) | -- | -- |
| Battery (total w/ case) (hours) | 30 | -- |
| Quick Charge | 5 minutes for 1 hour | -- |
| USB-C Charging | N | -- |
| Wireless Charging | Y | -- |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | -- |
| Weight (per bud) (g) | 4.28 | -- |
| Case Weight (g) | 37.91 | -- |
| Spatial Audio | Y | -- |
| Companion App | N | -- |
| Voice Assistant | Siri | -- |
| Warranty (months) | 12 | -- |
When comparing the Apple AirPods (3rd Generation) and the Bose Sport Earbuds II, a primary consideration for many users is comfort, and here the available specifications offer a partial picture. The AirPods (3rd Gen) are notably lightweight at just 4.28 g per bud, suggesting a comfortable, barely-there feel often associated with their open-fit design. This can be a significant advantage for extended listening sessions or for users who find in-ear tips intrusive. In contrast, the Bose Sport Earbuds II do not publish their per-bud weight, making a direct comparison on this specific comfort metric impossible based on the provided data. While the ‘Sport’ designation might imply a more secure, potentially deeper-fitting design, this often comes with trade-offs in long-term comfort for some users.
Delving into other technical aspects, the AirPods (3rd Gen) offer a robust battery performance with 6 hours of listening time on the buds and an impressive 30 hours total with the charging case. They also support convenient Wireless Charging and a Quick Charge feature, providing 1 hour of listening from just 5 minutes of charge. For the Bose Sport Earbuds II, battery life figures for the buds, total with case, quick charge capabilities, and wireless charging support are not published, leaving potential buyers without crucial information for endurance comparison. Similarly, while AirPods (3rd Gen) feature Spatial Audio for an immersive listening experience, Product B doesn’t publish whether it offers a similar feature.
Both products are designed for wireless use, with the AirPods (3rd Gen) utilizing Bluetooth Version 5.0 and the AAC audio codec. Product B doesn’t publish its Bluetooth version or supported audio codecs, which are key details for connectivity and audio transmission quality. Water resistance is a known factor for the AirPods (3rd Gen) at IPX4, making them suitable for splashes and light sweat. For the Bose Sport Earbuds II, despite their ‘Sport’ branding, a specific IP rating for water resistance is not published, which is a critical omission for earbuds marketed for active use. Neither product offers Active Noise Cancellation or Transparency Mode based on the published specs for AirPods (3rd Gen), and these features are not published for Product B either.
In terms of value, the Apple AirPods (3rd Generation) are priced at $128.5, while the Bose Sport Earbuds II come in at a slightly higher $147.5. Given the extensive published specifications for the AirPods (3rd Gen) and the significant lack of technical detail for the Bose Sport Earbuds II, the AirPods offer a clearer picture of what you’re buying. The absence of key specifications for the Bose Sport Earbuds II makes a comprehensive, spec-driven comparison challenging, forcing potential buyers to rely on brand reputation or external reviews rather than verifiable product data.
Scenario Performance Breakdown
How each product ranks based on its spec profile for common use cases.
commuting
Passive isolation only. External background noise will bleed in.
Passive isolation only. External background noise will bleed in.
gym/running
Sweat-resistant (IPX4). Lighter build at 4.28g.
Minimal or unrated sweat resistance. Not ideal for heavy workouts.
calls/work
Single device pairing only.
Single device pairing only.
audiophile listening
Standard Bluetooth codecs (SBC/AAC).
Standard Bluetooth codecs (SBC/AAC).
sleep
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
gaming
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
Affiliate Disclosure: We earn commissions on qualifying purchases through retail links on this site at no extra cost to you. We verify all specifications rigorously but are not responsible for pricing drifts on external retailer sites. Learn more in our Affiliate Disclosure.