Apple AirPods (3rd Generation) vs Samsung Galaxy Buds3
Technical Specs & Value Comparison
Comparison Summary
AirPods 3 vs Galaxy Buds3
Pros
- + Includes Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) for blocking out ambient noise, a feature absent in the AirPods 3, adding significant value.
- + Features Transparency Mode, allowing users to hear their surroundings without removing the earbuds.
- + Offers Multipoint Connection, enabling simultaneous pairing with multiple devices for enhanced productivity.
- + Superior IP57 water resistance rating, compared to the AirPods 3's IPX4, making it more durable for various conditions.
Cons
- - Higher current best price of $137.99 compared to the AirPods 3's $128.5, representing a higher cost.
- - Heavier earbuds at 5.9 g per bud, compared to the AirPods 3's 4.28 g, which might affect long-term comfort for some.
- - Lower total battery life of 24 hours with the case, compared to the AirPods 3's 30 hours.
Best for
- -- Commuting (Active Noise Cancellation and Transparency Mode for varied environments).
- -- Calls/work (Multipoint Connection, ANC, Transparency Mode, and companion app for customization).
- -- Gym/running (superior IP57 water resistance and the option of ANC/Transparency).
Apple AirPods (3rd Generation)
Samsung Galaxy Buds3
Full Specifications Comparison
Side-by-side technical specs of AirPods 3 and Galaxy Buds3 verified from official manufacturer documentation. Advantages are highlighted automatically.
| Specification | AirPods 3 | Galaxy Buds3 |
|---|---|---|
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size (mm) | -- | -- |
| Frequency Range | -- | -- |
| Impedance (Ω) | -- | -- |
| Sensitivity (dB) | -- | -- |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| Audio Codecs | ["AAC"] | ["SBC","AAC","SSC"] |
| Multipoint Connection | N | Y |
| Active Noise Cancellation | N | Y |
| ANC Reduction (dB) | -- | -- |
| Transparency Mode | N | Y |
| Battery (buds, ANC off) (hours) | 6 | 6 |
| Battery (buds, ANC on) (hours) | -- | 5 |
| Battery (total w/ case) (hours) | 30 | 24 |
| Quick Charge | 5 minutes for 1 hour | 10 min charge for 1 hour playback |
| USB-C Charging | N | Y |
| Wireless Charging | Y | Y |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IP57 |
| Weight (per bud) (g) | 4.28 | 5.9 |
| Case Weight (g) | 37.91 | 43.4 |
| Spatial Audio | Y | Y |
| Companion App | N | Y |
| Voice Assistant | Siri | Bixby, Google Assistant |
| Warranty (months) | 12 | 12 |
When comparing the Apple AirPods (3rd Generation) and the Samsung Galaxy Buds3, the ultimate value proposition hinges on what features you prioritize, especially given their close price points of $128.5 and $137.99, respectively. The Galaxy Buds3, despite being slightly pricier, offers a more feature-rich experience that many users will find compelling for the marginal increase in cost.
Both earbuds utilize dynamic drivers and support Spatial Audio, suggesting a similar foundational audio experience, though specific tuning will differ. However, the Galaxy Buds3 immediately pulls ahead with its inclusion of Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and Transparency Mode, features notably absent from the AirPods (3rd Generation). For users in noisy environments like commutes or open offices, the ability to block out distractions or remain aware of surroundings without removing the earbuds is a significant advantage. The Buds3 also boasts Multipoint Connection, allowing seamless switching between two devices, which is a key productivity feature missing from the AirPods 3.
Connectivity-wise, the Galaxy Buds3 sports a newer Bluetooth 5.4, compared to the AirPods’ Bluetooth 5.0. While both offer stable connections, the newer standard can potentially offer better efficiency and future-proofing. Samsung also provides a broader range of audio codecs, including SBC, AAC, and SSC, whereas the AirPods are limited to AAC. This could translate to more optimized audio transmission depending on the source device.
Battery life presents a mixed picture. The AirPods (3rd Generation) offer a superior total battery life of 30 hours with the charging case, compared to the Galaxy Buds3’s 24 hours. The AirPods also boast a faster quick charge, providing 1 hour of playback from just 5 minutes of charging, while the Buds3 requires 10 minutes for the same playback duration. However, the Buds3’s 6 hours of bud battery life (ANC off) matches the AirPods, and its 5 hours with ANC on is a respectable trade-off for the added noise-canceling capability.
Durability and convenience also lean towards Samsung. The Galaxy Buds3 feature an IP57 water resistance rating, significantly higher than the AirPods’ IPX4. This makes the Buds3 a more robust choice for intense workouts or exposure to dust and water. Furthermore, the Buds3 supports USB-C charging, a universal standard, alongside wireless charging, whereas the AirPods only offer wireless charging and do not support USB-C. The presence of a companion app for the Galaxy Buds3 allows for greater customization and control over features like ANC and EQ settings, an option not available for the AirPods 3.
On the flip side, the AirPods (3rd Generation) are noticeably lighter at 4.28 g per bud compared to the Galaxy Buds3’s 5.9 g, which might contribute to a more comfortable fit for some users over extended periods. Their charging case is also lighter at 37.91 g versus 43.4 g. The AirPods’ integration with Siri is standard for Apple users, while the Buds3 offers both Bixby and Google Assistant.
Ultimately, for a slightly higher price of $137.99, the Samsung Galaxy Buds3 delivers substantial upgrades in features like ANC, Transparency Mode, Multipoint Connection, higher water resistance (IP57), newer Bluetooth 5.4, USB-C charging, and a companion app. These enhancements offer considerable value for users seeking versatility and advanced functionalities. The AirPods (3rd Generation), at $128.5, remain a solid choice for those deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem who prioritize a lighter design, faster quick charge, and longer overall battery life, and who do not require active noise cancellation or multipoint connectivity.
Scenario Performance Breakdown
How each product ranks based on its spec profile for common use cases.
commuting
Passive isolation only. External background noise will bleed in.
Excellent isolation. Offers 5 hrs continuous ANC playback.
gym/running
Sweat-resistant (IPX4). Lighter build at 4.28g.
Fully waterproof (IP57) and highly durable.
calls/work
Single device pairing only.
Bluetooth Multipoint allows seamless dual-device connection.
audiophile listening
Standard Bluetooth codecs (SBC/AAC).
Standard Bluetooth codecs (SBC/AAC).
sleep
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
gaming
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
Meets basic specifications for typical use.
Affiliate Disclosure: We earn commissions on qualifying purchases through retail links on this site at no extra cost to you. We verify all specifications rigorously but are not responsible for pricing drifts on external retailer sites. Learn more in our Affiliate Disclosure.